臺灣農藥科學第四期電子書

訓練成效評估 97 表八 、以 Pearson 相關分析學員認知行為 (L3) 與農場經營績效 (L4) 之相關性 (n= 142) Table 8. Pearson correlation analysis between training cognitive behavior (L3) and farm operating benefit (L4) (n=142) Pesticides safety usage factor L3 1) L4 2) IPM 3) Identifying pesticide 4) Protective equipment 5) ICM 6) Sales increase 7) Income increase 8) Usage reduction 9) L3 1) IPM 3) 1 Identifying pesticide 4) .712** 1 Protective equipment 5) .686** .797** 1 ICM 6) .769** .750** .761** 1 L4 2) Sales increase 7) .074 .020 .021 .025 1 Farm income 8) .214* .182* .206* .158 .671** 1 Reduction in pesticide use 9) .243** .201* .107 .135 .260** .395** 1 1) L3: Level 3 (Behavior Level of Kirkpatrick’s four-level evaluation model). 2) L4: Level 4 (Results Level of Kirkpatrick’s four-level evaluation model). 3) Integrated Pest Management (IPM). 4) Identifying pesticide toxicity and understanding pesticide labels. 5) Protective equipment for safely handling pesticides. 6) Integrated Crop Management (ICM). 7) Rate of sales increase for agricultural products. 8) Rate of increase in net farm income. 9) Rate of reduction in pesticide use. ** The correlation was found to be significant at a level of 0.01 (two-tailed). * The correlation was found to be significant at a level of 0.05 (two-tailed). 討論 本研究 L2~L4 層級訓練成效評估之 主觀能力認知及客觀測驗結果，均會於 「年度講師會議」提出討論，並作為每年 度課程調整、講師遴選、時間安排 … 等之 檢討依據。並鼓勵講師於講授或實習課程 加強導入互動式教學，增加活潑性，增進 學員田間應用技術職能，以落實安全用藥 之目的。 一、學習層級之衡量—「訓練前 後測」調查 2016 年度參訓學員於學習 (L2) 層級 「訓練前後測」之主觀能力認知，經成對 樣本 t 檢定顯示參訓前、參訓後於安全用 藥四構面之自我認知有顯著差異 ( P < 0.001) ，尤其訓練前後認知差距高之課程 前 5 名依序為「農藥標示與偽劣農藥辨識 能力」、「農藥作用機制與抗藥性預防認