126 / 220
臺灣農藥科學 第
1
期
124
and Jordi, L. 2014. Determination of drift
potential of different flat fan nozzles on
a boom sprayer using a test bench. Crop
Prot. 56: 58-68.
5. Fritz, B. K., Hoffmann, W. C., Czaczyk, Z.,
Bagley, W., Kruger, G., and Henry, R. 2012.
Measurement and classification methods
using the ASABE S572.1 reference nozzle.
J. Plant Prot. Res. 52: 447-457.
6. Hilz, E., and Vermeer, A. V. P. 2013. Spray
drift review: the extent to which a formu-
lation can contribute to spray drift reduc-
tion. Crop Prot. 44: 75-83.
7. ISO Standard 10625: 2005. Equipment
for crop protection -- sprayer nozzles --
colour coding for identification. Interna-
tional Organization for Standardization.
Switzerland.
8. Ozkan, H. E. 2000. Reducing spray drift.
Bulletin 816-00. Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH, USA.
9. Teejet Technologies. 2016. Catalog 51A.
Broadcast nozzles XR Teejet. Available at
http://www.teejet.com10. United States Environmental Protection
Agency. 2016. Improving labels to reduce
pesticide drift. Available at https://www.
epa.gov/reducing-pesticide-drift/improv-
ing-labels-reduce- pesticide-drift
11. USEPA-ETV, RTI International, and Alion
Science & Technology. 2009. Test/QA plan
for the validation of the verification pro-
tocol for low speed pesticide spray drift
reduction technologies for row and field
crops. 600ETV11007.
12. Vern, H., and Elton, S. 2014. Spray equip-
ment and calibration. North Dakota State
University, Fargo, ND, USA. 44 pp.
13. Zhu, H., Salyani, M., and Fox, R. D. 2011.
A portable scanning system for evaluation
of spray deposit distribution. Comput.
Electron. Agr. 76: 38-43.